creature for 2-22-11

As a continuation of the Picture Book Dummy challenge (#PBDummy on Twitter) I’ve been blogging about the mechanics of each step along the way. Currently, the challenge is in the character development section. Normally, what I do is hunt down links to what other experienced artists have had to say. Sadly, aside from a smattering places, and fewer books than that, there isn’t much out there. My two blog posts (to the right) on the picture book dummy are actually among the top search results. And I have already said what I said, so linking to myself is downright silly.

One of the differences in creating a picture book illustration as opposed to single images is the need for sequential art. The characters in the story line need to be drawn multiple times, accurately and in many different poses. Facial emotion is a top priority in story telling through visual media.

With that in mind I hunted for information on comic and graphic novel art development. There was a tad bit more, but still rather slim pickings.

Names that came up were:

Tom Bancroft (Walt Diseny) Creating Characters with Personality
Will Eisner Graphic Storytelling and Visual Narrative, Comics and Sequential Art: Principles and Practices
and Scott McCloud Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art , Understanding Comics.

All of them are pillars in what they do (did) but beyond the basics, the media of children’s books and the comic book require a different type of art. Most dramatically, is the fact that most graphic novels and comics are done with the end reader as an adult in mind. Sexy, blond bombshells and mysterious, evil villains receive top billing there. Picture books, on the other hand, often feature young children, animals, or adult stand-ins with very childlike qualities. With Disney movies, the end viewer is the family, but animation requires a different skill set than a printed piece. What these people have to say about character design and visual story telling provide a strong foundation for any children’s book illustrator.

And with that said, I am off to my pencils and pads. I have a bunch of characters to bring to fruition for my challenge dummy. I’ll post something when the characters reveal themselves to me.

14. February 2011 · Comments Off · Categories: Books, Off the Shelf Challenge

Last year I signed up for the Off the Shelf book challenge. Here is my list with titles in red of titles I’ve already read.

1. Paranormalcy
2. Need
3. Sisters Red
4.The Keening (ARC)
5. Theodosia and the Last Pharaoh (ARC)
6. Majix: Notes From a Serious Teen Witch (ARC)
7. Nathaniel Fludd: Beastologist, Book 4: The Unicorn’s Tale (ARC)
8. Beyond Happiness (ARC)
9. Ordinary Recovery (ARC)
10. ChristoPaganism: An Inclusive Path
11. A Walk Through a Window (which I haven’t actually received yet, but is expected) Looks like I won’t be receiving this book after all.
12. Dreamweaver CS5 for Dummies 9 in 1 (ARC)

13. Photoshop CS5 for Dummies (ARC)
14. Spindles End
15. Freedom’s Landing

I am more than half way done. Since book 11 never arrived, I looked on my shelves for other books I purchased at one point or another and never read.

11(a). Evolutionary Witchcraft

I am currently reading Majix. (I also read a few other books not on the list. The 39 Clues series titles 1-7. I know. I’m terrible.)

We went to the book store on Saturday, and I was a good little book muncher and didn’t buy a single new title. I did get a magazine though. It’s called Altered Couture. I spent yesterday working on a shirt. Before and after pictures will be posted soon.

creature for February 3, 2011

Creature for the day

Over at Twitter #kidlitart, my cohost @BonnieAdamson and I (@WendyMartinArt), are gearing up for tonight’s chat (9PM eastern every Thur.)

Last month we began the Picture Book Dummy challenge. Basically, the members of the chat are putting together a picture book dummy from start to finish. The challenge ends in June.

This evening is the last week we will be discussing ‘story’ in manuscript form. Next week we begin the section on character development. For the illustrator, this is the meat of the project.

I decided I needed to follow along with the group in order to be better able to judge what topics need to be addressed as we move forward. So I dug out an old manuscript I had been noodling with as a self promo piece. I wrote it originally way back before my first book was published. Since that time I have joined the Society of Children’s Book Writer’s and Illustrators, been to several national conferences and local ones as well as some intensives. I’ve learned a lot, grown as both illustrator and writer. The document I opened, in a word – sucked.

So I began over. I have a fun story at about 450 words. The only thing it’s lacking is a great ending. Plus, with the current trend to shorter and shorter picture books, I have only 50 words to do it in. Less would be better.

What makes a great ending?

On  Marisa Montes’ web page, she states, “There are two endings to a book: physical and emotional.  What did the characters go through and what is their response?

The “physical resolution” means the solution to the puzzle, the problem overcome, the plot resolved.  The “emotional resolution” means how did the characters feel as they went through this experience and how were they changed.  At the beginning they might feel worried; at the end, relieved or happy.” (Scroll to the very bottom to see her book map.)

In short, the end of the story, should wrap up the action in a satisfying manner. The main character should have resolved some issue and there should be a bit of a teaser as well.

Teaser? I know you are scratching your head on that one. What I mean by that is the end should be a very tiny bit of a cliff hanger. Not so much that the book seems to be cut off in the middle, but enough so that the reader gets the impression that the story continues beyond the last page of the book. No ‘and they lived happily ever after,’ that’s just a yawn!

 

creature for january 28, 2011

creature for the day

In this day and age, there are so many forms of entertainment, from TV and DVDs to hand held video games and phone apps. The simple pleasures of a book have become buried under all the technology.

When I was a child, my parents only allowed my brother and I two hours of TV a night. The two of us had to take turns on which shows we wanted to watch. Other restrictions include not being able to watch game shows, sitcoms or soap opera type things. It makes me wonder if my parents watch reality shows these days. I know my mother watches the shopping channels. Don’t ask me to explain it, I haven’t a clue.

But that’s neither here nor there.

The Childrens’ Foundation recommends reading to your child for 20 minutes a day. They claim it will be the most important 20 minutes in your day. Reading is a skill everyone must have to be a functioning member of today’s world. Think of all the myriad of tasks you go through in a typical day and how few of them DO NOT require you to read. By the time a child has reached third grade, their reading change from learning the mechanics to needing the skill to learn further. Advanced education isn’t possible with a strong reading foundation.

When I was young, we first learned to read in elementary school. When my daughter was young, reading was first taught in kindergarten. Children now are learning to read in pre-school. Precursors to reading such as recognizing letters and understanding vocabulary are also being taught at younger and younger ages. Kids who are read to have a leg up on their peers because they have been introduced to the world of wonders books can provide.

According to several studies, children in homes with access to books are smarter then children who don’t have the same opportunity. Planet Green has an article with suggestions for busy parents or for those who cannot afford to create an in house library for their children. When my daughter was little, we went to the library every Saturday. I allowed her to pick out a book for each day of the week, to be read at bedtime. Those days are some of my fondest memories of time spent with her.

Books make kids smarter. Smarter kids are smarter adults. Smarter adults will be able to contribute better to the world they live in. All because of a few picture books at bedtime.

 

creature for january 25, 2011

Daily doodle creature 1-25-11

The 2011 awards were announced earlier this month. http://www.ala.org/ Award winners Winner: A Sick Day for Amos McGee illustrated by Erin E. Stead, written by Philip C. Stead, and is a Neal Porter Book, published by Roaring Brook Press, a division of Holtzbrinck Publishing Honor Books: Dave the Potter: Artist, Poet Slave illustrated by Bryan Collier, written by Laban Carrick Hill and published by Little, Brown and Company, a division of Hachette Book Group, Inc. and Interrupting Chicken written and illustrated by David Ezra Stein, and published by Candlewick Press. Sadly, I have yet to see any of these books.

Last year’s books for 2010 Randolph Caldecott Medal are the winner: The Lion & the Mouse , illustrated and written by Jerry Pinkney (Little, Brown and Company Books for Young Readers) The screech of an owl, the squeak of a mouse and the roar of a lion transport readers to the Serengeti plains for this virtually wordless retelling of Aesop’s classic fable. In glowing colors, Pinkney’s textured watercolor illustrations masterfully portray the relationship between two very unlikely friends. And the two honor books: All the World , illustrated by Marla Frazee, written by Liz Garton Scanlon, published by Beach Lane Books. Frazee’s small vignettes and sweeping double-page spreads invite readers to share a joyful day with a diverse, multigenerational community. Flowing lines and harmonious colors give vibrant life to Scanlon’s poetic text; and Red Sings from Treetops: A Year in Colors, illustrated by Pamela Zagarenski, written by Joyce Sidman, published by  Houghton Mifflin Books for Children, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Zagarenski’s playful illustrations enliven Sidman’s expressive poetry in this exploration of the seasons and their colors. Computer illustration and mixed-media paintings on wood combine rich textures, intriguing graphic elements, stunning colors and stylized figures to reward attentive readers with a visually exciting interplay of poetry and illustration.

What makes these books better than the hundreds of other picture books published in 2010? (To see the criteria and focus of the Caldecott Award go to the ALSC web site: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alsc/awardsgrants/bookmedia/caldecottmedal/caldecottterms/caldecottterms.cfm.) The honor of these awards is for an illustrator of merit.

I have been a huge fan of Marla Frazee (the illustrator for one of the honor books) for many years. Her style is one of deceptive simplicity. Something I have worked toward emulating in my own very complicated style. I know from experience, such stunning work is neither simple nor easy. The 2010 winning book has few words, and the art itself is breathtaking. I’m sure the artist spent a great deal of time working out all the myriad details needed to tell a wordless story. I’m not familiar with the third book, so can’t comment.

In my travels around the internet, there seems to be a consensus that the winners for this award seem to follow a trend of multiculturalism and education. From what I can observe in this year’s winners, such a statement appears to be holding true. Does that mean an illustrator should strive to create a multicultural world in his or her work? Since I do this in my books as a matter of course, it’s hard for me to say if all illustrators should. I know my practice comes from the years I spent in advertising where we had to have a cross section of humanity in the work we were producing. In me, such behavior has become an ingrained habit.

According to the Crafty Writer (http://www.thecraftywriter.com/2007/08/15/what-makes-a-good-childrens-book/) a good picture book has many of the same elements as any good book. A well crafted, original story that keeps the intended reader in mind. The difference in picture books, is of course, the illustrations. Because the two parts make up the whole, they have to be excellent on their own. Bad writing will kill a story no matter how beautiful the illustrations are. The inverse is also true. Mediocre illustrations just can’t be carried by the text. This is even more of an issue now when picture book texts have declined in length to a mere few hundred words. The illustrations must carry their own weight in the story telling arena.

The Through the Tollbooth blog (http://community.livejournal.com/thru_the_booth/35438.html) states that it is easier to say what a good picture book is by listing what it is not: boring, maudlin, preachy, flat, confusing, or long-winded. Lots of new writers think they need to create books that teach morals. Kids know when they are being preached at, and they don’t like it. Such a book will fall flat before it ever has a chance to make it to market. There is no need to explain why a book needs to avoid being boring. Nobody likes being bored. Since a picture book is most often read to the child, the story has to be entertaining and engaging for both the adult and the youngster.

On the Teach with Picture Books’ web site (http://teachwithpicturebooks.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-makes-good-picture-book.html) we’re told that a picture book must have a universal theme which can cross boundaries of culture, age and gender. Plus, the book must create its own world in which the young reader feels welcome no matter how outlandish or unusual the setting.

That’s an awful lot of requirements to fit into a 32 page book. Can you think of recent books that fall into the ‘good’ book category? Leave a comment and tell us about them and why you think they are good examples.